Investigation of Multidrug Resistance of Isolated Streptococcus spp: Eight Years of Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56286/bdxkee39Keywords:
Streptococcus, UTI, Multi-Drug Resistance, Iraq, superbugs, extreme resistance, Epidemiology, antibioticsAbstract
Streptococcus species are associated with a wide range of infections, from mild conditions to serious illnesses, and are wellknown for their high levels of antimicrobial resistance. This study investigates the sensitivity and multidrugresistant manifestation of examined Streptococcus spp. over eight years (2016–2022 and 2024). A total of 2451 participants were included, comprising 396 males and 2055 females. Clinical samples were collected from infected patients and followed a standard protocol of sample processing in the laboratory. Suspected samples were analysed via standard microbiological procedures. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method. Out of all participants, Streptococcus spp. were confirmed in 255 (10.4%). Urinary tract infections accounted for the majority of these cases, with (73.3%) of Streptococcus -positive patients presenting with urinary tract infections. Infection rates were significantly higher in females (83.4%) compared with (16.6%) in males. Seasonally, February, May and June showed the greatest number of confirmed cases, with Streptococcus spp. and S. pyogenes being the most frequently detected species during these months. Agewise, the highest infection rates occurred among individuals aged 20-24 and 25–29 years (17.3% and 14.9%, respectively). Multidrug resistance was prominent: 74,35% of Strep.. pyogenes isolates; 59.87% Strep. spp; 64.28% of Strp.. viridans, and 100% of Strep. faecalis exhibited resistance to at least three antibiotic classes. Overall, 65.49% of all Streptococcus spp. Isolates were classified as multidrugresistant. The isolates showed particularly high resistance to several commonly used antibiotics, including βlactam antibiotics, Oxacillin (96.7%), Ceftazidime (93%), Aztreonam (90.9%), Cloxacillin (86.3% ), and . High resistance was also observed against erythromycin (a macrolide), nalidixic acid (a fluoroquinolone), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, all showing different levels of resistance, with the highest sensitivity to imipenem and meropenem (75%). The findings highlight a concerning rise in Streptococcus infections and resistance levels over the study period. Routine susceptibility testing and revisions to empirical treatment strategies are strongly recommended to ensure effective patient management.
Downloads
References
V. Bamrung and P. Sitthicharoenchai, “The evolving story of Streptococcus gallolyticus: classification, pathogenesis, role in human and animal disease, and laboratory diagnostics,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 17, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1765252.
A. Thacharodi et al., “The burden of group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections: The challenge continues in the twenty-first century,” iScience, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 111677, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111677.
S. Sayols-Baixeras et al., “Streptococcus Species Abundance in the Gut Is Linked to Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in 8973 Participants From the SCAPIS Cohort,” Circulation, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 459–472, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063914.
V. Girlando, L. De Angelis, G. D’Egidio, A. Di Ludovico, and L. Breda, “From Infection to Autoimmunity: S. pyogenes as a Model Pathogen,” Microorganisms, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1398, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061398.
A. Rana, A. Malik, and R. C. Sobti, “Anti-bacterial Properties of Propolis: A Comprehensive Review.,” Curr. Microbiol., vol. 82, no. 10, p. 479, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00284-025-04456-y.
J. A. Alara and O. R. Alara, “An Overview of the Global Alarming Increase of Multiple Drug Resistant: A Major Challenge in Clinical Diagnosis,” Infect. Disord. Drug Targets, vol. 24, no. 3, May 2024, doi: 10.2174/1871526523666230725103902.
S. K. Ahmed et al., “Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects,” Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, vol. 2, p. 100081, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100081.
A. Karnwal, A. Y. Jassim, A. A. Mohammed, A. R. M. S. Al-Tawaha, M. Selvaraj, and T. Malik, “Addressing the global challenge of bacterial drug resistance: insights, strategies, and future directions,” Front. Microbiol., vol. 16, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1517772.
J. G. , Collee, M. B. Fraser AG, Simmons A, and McCartne, Practical Medical Microbiology. , 14th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 1996.
E. J. Baron, L. R. Peterson, and S. M. Finegold, Bailey and Scott’s Diagnosis Microbiology , 9th Edition. Toronto: C.V. Mosby Company, 1995.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2015) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 25th Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S25, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
C. J. L. Murray et al., “Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 399, no. 10325, pp. 629–655, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0.
R. Price, “O’Neill report on antimicrobial resistance: funding for antimicrobial specialists should be improved,” European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 245–247, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-001013.
M. Exner et al., “Antibiotic resistance: What is so special about multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria?,” GMS Hyg. Infect. Control, vol. 12, p. Doc05, 2017, doi: 10.3205/dgkh000290.
Z. Zeng, J. Zhan, K. Zhang, H. Chen, and S. Cheng, “Global, regional, and national burden of urinary tract infections from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019,” World J. Urol., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 755–763, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03913-0.
A.-P. Magiorakos et al., “Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 268–281, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.
N. Sihra, A. Goodman, R. Zakri, A. Sahai, and S. Malde, “Nonantibiotic prevention and management of recurrent urinary tract infection,” Nat. Rev. Urol., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 750–776, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0106-x.
K. Czajkowski, M. Broś-Konopielko, and J. Teliga-Czajkowska, “Urinary tract infection in women,” Menopausal Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2021, doi: 10.5114/pm.2021.105382.
M. J. González, L. Robino, P. Zunino, and P. Scavone, “Urinary tract infection: is it time for a new approach considering a gender perspective and new microbial advances?,” Front. in Urol., vol. 4, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1487858.
M. Medina and E. Castillo-Pino, “An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary tract infections,” Ther. Adv. Urol., vol. 11, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1756287219832172.
A. Al-Badr and G. Al-Shaikh, “Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Management in Women : A Review = الإلتهابات المتكررة للمسالك البولية عند النساء و طرق علاجها : مراجعة,” Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 359–367, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.12816/0003256.
B. Foxman, R. Barlow, H. D’Arcy, B. Gillespie, and J. D. Sobel, “Urinary Tract Infection,” Ann. Epidemiol., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 509–515, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00072-7.
S. L. Jackson, E. J. Boyko, D. Scholes, L. Abraham, K. Gupta, and S. D. Fihn, “Predictors of urinary tract infection after menopause: A prospective study,” Am. J. Med., vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 903–911, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.07.045.
J. E. Simmering, L. A. Polgreen, J. E. Cavanaugh, B. A. Erickson, M. Suneja, and P. M. Polgreen, “Warmer Weather and the Risk of Urinary Tract Infections in Women,” J. Urol., vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 500–506, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001383.
H. Elser et al., “Ambient temperature and risk of urinary tract infection in California: A time-stratified case-crossover study using electronic health records,” Environ. Int., vol. 165, p. 107303, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107303.
H. Ledford, “Why is strep A surging — and how worried are scientists?,” Nature, vol. 612, no. 7941, pp. 603–603, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-04403-y.
B. Valcarcel Salamanca et al., “Increase in invasive group A streptococcal infections (iGAS) in children and older adults, Norway, 2022 to 2024,” Eurosurveillance, vol. 29, no. 20, May 2024, doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.20.2400242.
I. Gajic et al., “A Comprehensive Overview of Antibacterial Agents for Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: The Current Landscape, Development, Future Opportunities, and Challenges,” Antibiotics, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 221, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030221.
H.-J. Lee, J.-Y. Park, S.-H. Jang, J.-H. Kim, E.-C. Kim, and K.-W. Choi, “High Incidence of Resistance to Multiple Antimicrobials in Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from a University Hospital in Korea,” Clin. Infect. Dis., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 826–835, Apr. 1995, doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.4.826.
A. B. Temesgen and S. A. Shiferaw, “Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance and Mechanisms of Action: An Overview,” Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2025, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1155/bmri/8847267.
D. Ding et al., “The spread of antibiotic resistance to humans and potential protection strategies,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 254, p. 114734, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114734.
J. Nammi, R. Pasala, N. Andhe, R. Vasam, A. D. Poruri, and R. R. Sherikar, “Antibiotic Misuse: An In-Depth Examination of Its Global Consequences and Public Health Challenges,” Cureus, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.7759/cureus.85941.
S.-H. Choi et al., “Comparative in vitro activities of carbapenem antimicrobial agents against 264 penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Korea,” Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 141–143, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.11.017.
S.-W. Kim et al., “Therapeutic Efficacy of Meropenem for Treatment of Experimental Penicillin-Resistant Pneumococcal Meningitis,” J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 21, 2004, doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.1.21.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

